AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

Hereinafter said:

post #8792444

Has this artist been discussed? Would mass flagging be warranted?

This account used to be open about AI usage. Their posting frequency and the artefacting going on in some of those warrants skepticism as to how much human involvement there really is.
Edit: They claim to "use AI gens as a base then redraw the whole thing in their own style" which is kind of hard to buy when "their own style" looks exactly like any other nyantcha LORA prompter's and involves shit like double collarbones (post #8857342) for a start, but you can draw your own conclusions.

Updated by Diet Soda

I'm targeting a single post #8996289 here bacause there is something about it I can't put my finger on but it raises my hairs about it possibly having some sort of AI involvement in its creation, but I have no hard evidence. It could just as easily be me being paranoid or the artist shading just being so detailed it reminded me of the stereotypical AI shading, again I have no hard evidence. At least, her eyes don't look fucked, maybe I am just being paranoid?

Searchwanted said:

I'm targeting a single post #8996289 here bacause there is something about it I can't put my finger on but it raises my hairs about it possibly having some sort of AI involvement in its creation, but I have no hard evidence. It could just as easily be me being paranoid or the artist shading just being so detailed it reminded me of the stereotypical AI shading, again I have no hard evidence. At least, her eyes don't look fucked, maybe I am just being paranoid?

looks normal to me

Adding to the above, it should actually be riteral id:>=8470483 to check for. The comment chain is specifically in post #8992743 discussing the background but since most of their newer works have this same style, it'd be best to review them all in one fell swoop. There are process images in the Pixiv albums of each of the posts that they're sourced from that are also worth taking a look at.

While their comment picks issue with post #8992743 and brings up the other two as example, it wouldn't be unreasonable to think anything beyond that point would be done in the same way - as in, if it's actually found that these are AI-generated backgrounds (or assisted in any other way), it's likely their other works are also the same.

Updated by WRS