AI-generated art check thread

demu said:

I would like some opinions on satokocel extremely new account
post #9556990 with 4 finger hand
also started advertising commissions with multiple styles?

In post #9556990 , there’re some small dots that didn't get the right color near black lines. This is a common issue that occurs during manual coloring. If you zoom in, you can also see flaws in the overlapping areas where two lines meet. Such flaws are also common in manual painting.
However, to me, aside from the 4 finger hand, the most suspicious part of this work is the end of the wide ribbon behind the character. A part of it is missing on the inner side of her right leg.
This could be AI tracing, but at least parts of it were manually painted.

What do you think about this image? The author says it's not AI-generated, but I'm not convinced

pixiv #131921963

Popkornikus said:

What do you think about this image? The author says it's not AI-generated, but I'm not convinced

pixiv #131921963

The art is upscaled, and the hair is extremely sus. Has those splotches and merging AI typically does.

Popkornikus said:

What do you think about this image? The author says it's not AI-generated, but I'm not convinced

pixiv #131921963

I would say they are creative enough to put a large rock on cloth/paper and let the character hold up her tail with the bottom of her feet while using her knees to support her body.

korose163 seems very suspicious. The style looks very similar to osakana_(denpa_yun'yun) with very noticeable AI-like blemishes.

I got post #9587596 flagged as AI, but there is nothing on metadata, post or artist profile that even mention AI usage, resolution doesn't match the rule of thumb for AI, (nor width and height are divisible by 8) and the notes given by the flag report doesn't make sense for it's reasons

• Nonsensical neckerchief - It were drawn slightly to left, so the arm is covering part of the neckerchief, but the frills are still visible
• Growth on the left scrunchie - Couldn't see anything abnormal in the left hand scrunchie.
• Ahoge not connected to head - It is clearly connected, but there is a line "separating" head and ahoge

so I'd like another opinion

KoakumaBR said:

I got post #9587596 flagged as AI, but there is nothing on metadata, post or artist profile that even mention AI usage, resolution doesn't match the rule of thumb for AI, (nor width and height are divisible by 8) and the notes given by the flag report doesn't make sense for it's reasons

• Nonsensical neckerchief - It were drawn slightly to left, so the arm is covering part of the neckerchief, but the frills are still visible
• Growth on the left scrunchie - Couldn't see anything abnormal in the left hand scrunchie.
• Ahoge not connected to head - It is clearly connected, but there is a line "separating" head and ahoge

so I'd like another opinion

I agree with the flagger. The ornament on her neckerchief is supposed to be shaped like a paper boat not a vague blob. The color is also wrong. The top part of the ribbon should just be blue, not blue with a white gradient and the bottom should be dark blue and white. Her pocket is also supposed to have a paper boat icon but this one is nonsense. Also one of the nails on her right hand has the typical AI melting going on.

KoakumaBR said:

I got post #9587596 flagged as AI, but there is nothing on metadata, post or artist profile that even mention AI usage, resolution doesn't match the rule of thumb for AI, (nor width and height are divisible by 8) and the notes given by the flag report doesn't make sense for it's reasons

• Nonsensical neckerchief - It were drawn slightly to left, so the arm is covering part of the neckerchief, but the frills are still visible
• Growth on the left scrunchie - Couldn't see anything abnormal in the left hand scrunchie.
• Ahoge not connected to head - It is clearly connected, but there is a line "separating" head and ahoge

so I'd like another opinion

Sameko Saba has only one wrist scrunchie and it is on her right arm.

KoakumaBR said:

I got post #9587596 flagged as AI, but there is nothing on metadata, post or artist profile that even mention AI usage, resolution doesn't match the rule of thumb for AI, (nor width and height are divisible by 8) and the notes given by the flag report doesn't make sense for it's reasons

• Nonsensical neckerchief - It were drawn slightly to left, so the arm is covering part of the neckerchief, but the frills are still visible
• Growth on the left scrunchie - Couldn't see anything abnormal in the left hand scrunchie.
• Ahoge not connected to head - It is clearly connected, but there is a line "separating" head and ahoge

so I'd like another opinion

Some further points:

• The way the frills end at her shoulders is very unnatural: Not enough volume on her left arm, and it suddenly just melts with her hair in her right arm.
• Below the lemon you see some shading which I assume was meant to represent her collarbones, but it looks very badly positioned.

Thoughts on this? post #7383594

The shadows are too inconsistent and people elsewhere are accusing it of being ai. However, it's over a year old and their style has always been like this.

I found a new artist on Pixiv; I don't think it's AI, but I've been burned too many times already to be sure.

Placeholder1996 said:

I found a new artist on Pixiv; I don't think it's AI, but I've been burned too many times already to be sure.

I remember someone mentioned this before.
And, look at her left hand, what is that finger-like thing???
Her hair on left shoulder looks weird too.

I also checked the artist's other works then I believe the artist uses AI.

asgembed said:

I remember someone mentioned this before.
And, look at her left hand, what is that finger-like thing???
Her hair on left shoulder looks weird too.

I also checked the artist's other works then I believe the artist uses AI.

I think that finger thing is a gap in the hair, letting the background show through. I looked at it some more after my initial post, and I agree with your assessment; in particular, I don't like the way the collar looks in the linked image. In any case, I'm not going to risk posting it.

Hi, this is perhaps a random question but can someone explain why there are zero images that are tagged both "ai-generated" and "animated"?

did danbooru decide to ban all animated ai?

salty828 said:

Hi, this is perhaps a random question but can someone explain why there are zero images that are tagged both "ai-generated" and "animated"?

did you forget to add status:any to show deleted posts? all fully ai-generated posts are prohibited, regardless of format.

Kaleidoscoped said:

did you forget to add status:any to show deleted posts? all fully ai-generated posts are prohibited, regardless of format.

oh I see now, so the 10,000 ai-generated images are considered ai-assisted or something like that.

salty828 said:

oh I see now, so the 10,000 ai-generated images are considered ai-assisted or something like that.

No, ai-generated and ai-assisted are different, the former being 100% against the upload rules. Those 10k posts are still ai-generated.

salty828 said:

Hi, this is perhaps a random question but can someone explain why there are zero images that are tagged both "ai-generated" and "animated"?

did danbooru decide to ban all animated ai?

ai-generated animated gives 100 posts. All deleted, not banned. Adding status:banned to the search gives only 1 post.

lol kinda weird you've got 10,000 images that are against the rules

asset #27803942 I can't tell if this is AI generated or not; a part of me says "yes" while another says "no." I need eyes other than mine to look at it. (warning: nsfw)