reg_panda said:
I don’t think so, no. That’s really close to being G-rated
Posted under General
reg_panda said:
I don’t think so, no. That’s really close to being G-rated
post #2240964, post #2234124 and post #2060332 (recently tagged loli) being used as examples off-site as loli/shota. Not someone who posts much of either so I'll at least ask here
post #9589572 and post #8734640
Do they need to be tagged with loli?
asgembed said:
post #9589572 and post #8734640
Do they need to be tagged with loli?
1 maybe, 2 definitely (anal tail).
It's meant to be ship art, but is post #9597620 overt enough to need yaoi/onii-shota tags?
togechu said:
It's meant to be ship art, but is post #9597620 overt enough to need yaoi/onii-shota tags?
I think topic #12251 is more appropriate to ask this.
asgembed said:
I think topic #12251 is more appropriate to ask this.
I think what asgembed was trying to say was that if an image with someone that young qualifies for both yaoi and onii-shota, then it should probably also be tagged with shota.
Is it really loli?
Freshblink said:
Is it really loli?
Definitely not. She looks no younger than a teenager.
post #9599165 oppai loli?
post #9599172 loli?
I accidentally added the shots tag under post #5034138 as there is nothing that is sexualized with Chongyun in the post