remove implication anatomical_nonsense -> bad_anatomy
I find it sort of strange that anatomical nonsense is implied to bad anatomy, when both sound fairly subjective but will see prevalent use anyway. Anatomical nonsense skirts the line of tag group:subjective, after all. Some anatomical nonsense is used for unique artistic appeal, such as in post #2282030 or post #2605869 where the proportions are obviously and intentionally drawn ridiculously. Personally, I don't think it detracts from the appeal of the art.
Honestly, we could really use more flexibility with what users are allowed to upload, as some of the posts in anatomical nonsense, although ridiculous, have a unique artistic merit to them that would warrant approving again if they were to be flagged.
anatomical nonsense in itself isn't bad, which bad anatomy seems to convey the idea of. That's why I'm suggesting they be deimplicated, and we make a clear distinction between when to use one or the other, or to use both.
EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.
EDIT: The bulk update request #1062 (forum #126103) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
Updated by DanbooruBot