The bulk update request #10351 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication above_clouds -> cloud
After looking through above_clouds -cloud, I couldn't find a post that I wouldn't tag cloud, however there was an instance (tagged with cloud) where you couldn't see the clouds shape itself in post #5307906, but imo this alone shouldn't stop the implication.
It's true that we can have an image where the viewer is so high in the stratosphere that we couldn't see the clouds, but we could infer the camera is positioned above them due to the stars in the sky or the sun itself, I didn't find any image like that, the closest example I remember seeing is post #3573459. Despite this, I believe cases like these aren't exactly what the tag is for and could be replaced with space, I assume anyone searching above clouds expect seeing clouds.