Untagged male focus posts

BUR #25609 has been rejected.

mass update 1boy solo -animal -male_focus -> male_focus

If there is 1boy in a post and is the only character on that post (solo), then it should be tagged with male focus.

What if there are posts where there is indeed 1boy but also many other unidentifiable people in the background whose gender can't be discerned. Yes, those could be mistags but this BUR will further mistag those posts.

As per the wiki

This tag does not apply if the male(s) are an insignificant part of an image that focuses on something else, such as scenery (ex. post #4921679, post #4899185)

I attempted to do something similar in forum #270675 with mass update multiple_boys -*girl* -*other* -*futa* -*cuntboy* -ambigious_gender -> male_focus which had the same issue due to wide-shots.

But holy fuck even filtering for multiple_boys rating:explicit -*girl* -*other* -*futa* -*cuntboy* -ambigious_gender -male_focus -guilty_gear still results in posts like post #7461915, post #6928158 because someone was too horny or too stupid to tag them with 1girl.

It's a common issue due to the mere existence of the tag, but also needs manual gardening due to the mentioned issues.

Good luck.

The bulk update request #25609 (forum #278385) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.