BUR #42055 has been rejected.
create implication saint_celestine -> living_saint
Celestine is a living saint of the Imperium (If you don’t know 40K, she’s the most well known but not the only one of them)
Posted under Tags
BUR #42055 has been rejected.
create implication saint_celestine -> living_saint
Celestine is a living saint of the Imperium (If you don’t know 40K, she’s the most well known but not the only one of them)
Knowledge_Seeker said:
I'm not a Warhammer 40K fan, but I do think you should know by now cross category implications are impossible.
To be fair, Damian changed that one's category to general 20 minutes ago so it's not their fault.
I don't know anything about Warhammer either so I can't help here.
GranAutismo said:
To be fair, Damian changed that one's category to general 20 minutes ago so it's not their fault.
Yeah, and then you see that Siegfield himself manually moved it to be a chartag several months ago without any discussion, just like he did for topic #31041.
Damian0358 said:
Yeah, and then you see that Siegfield himself manually moved it to be a chartag several months ago without any discussion, just like he did for topic #31041.
Unlike that time, when categories were changed by them right before creating the BUR, this one's was changed five months ago. That said, I don't know what category is right or wrong here so I'll stand aside from this topic.
GranAutismo said:
Unlike that time, when categories were changed by them right before creating the BUR, this one's was changed five months ago. That said, I don't know what's right or wrong so I'll stand aside from this topic.
The main thing to consider this time is the fact that he wanted to imply an individual to a group. It would be like if topic #26066 went through.
The bulk update request #42055 (forum #359430) has been rejected by @evazion.
Wyrmmidon said:
What if someone chooses to depict Celestine pre-sainthood, or as an otherwise normal human?
This is why we don't do "character tag -> general tag" implications. General tags are descriptions of a character, and no description of a character will always hold true no matter what. There's always the possibility of a character being depicted differently because of artistic license.
Thought this idea of not implicating canon object/species tags was explained to him in forum #347082 but I guess the difference between armament and character caused no connection to be made.