Danbooru

Pointless Pools

Posted under General

iori98

Nameless_Contributor said:

There can be comics, multiple views or cross-section/x-ray in which case a penis is visible.
See pool:18665 -penis

I still think it's a pointless pool given that the pool is basically a curated deepthroat tag . You can find most of those pics in two tags and deepthroat wiki page even lists the common tag combo.

Reply
nanashi3

Not a pointless pool but pool #2887 (Sexy & Extremely Girly) is being used by @Claverhouse as his personal sfw girly girl fav group (not all the posts but a lot of them), which to my impression goes against the original intent of the pool?

A solution would be to split and make a new "Extremely Girly" pool, but would this one be considered pointless by Danbooru?

Reply
DeusExCalamus

nanashi3 said:

Not a pointless pool but pool #2887 (Sexy & Extremely Girly) is being used by @Claverhouse as his personal sfw girly girl fav group (not all the posts but a lot of them), which to my impression goes against the original intent of the pool?

A solution would be to split and make a new "Extremely Girly" pool, but would this one be considered pointless by Danbooru?

He's been warned previously about similar things, too.

Reply
The Bob

nanashi3 said:

Not a pointless pool but pool #2887 (Sexy & Extremely Girly) is being used by @Claverhouse as his personal sfw girly girl fav group (not all the posts but a lot of them), which to my impression goes against the original intent of the pool?

A solution would be to split and make a new "Extremely Girly" pool, but would this one be considered pointless by Danbooru?

I wouldn't mind a "girly" pool, tbh. It's a specific aesthetic that's not really findable through tags alone.

Reply
blindVigil

Tbh, I think the current pool is in a really awkward position. "Sexy" is kind of ambiguous, on top of being subjective, so it's no wonder the pool has been subject to pollution ever since it was created, when its description doesn't do much to properly establish what counts as "sexy" or "girly", besides a single example post citing "girly details." Claverhouse isn't the only one misusing it, though he's been doing it consistently since 2016 (someone seriously needs to do an extensive review of all his pool edits).

We could repurpose it into an all encompassing girly pool, since I doubt "girly" is objective enough to be a tag, though we do have girly boy and girly running, so maybe it could be. If it stays as a pool, rating can be used to filter between the "sexy," "clean," and "dirty" posts.

Reply
1 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 164