Bad foreshortening / perspective isn't even a legit reason for flagging. Why do you think bad perspective tag is exist in the first place?
Whoever you are, if you somehow grew bitter of me because of "THAT" thread, then you're acting childish within disguise of formal action.
I didn't flag it, but where is it written that bad perspective is not a legit reason? As long as the flag reason does not fall under this part: "The following are NOT valid reasons for flagging a post:
Duplicate: just parent to the original Banned artist: request that a member of site staff ban this post instead"
And "allowed content" as a flag reason like loli, guro, furry is also not valid/allowed.
Ummm, but the perspective is quite good? Sure the hand looks kinda weird but that's not the big issue. Whoever flagged this is kinda a crappy user for flagging stuff of this quality. And by saying crappy is realy means that he's bad.
I didn't flag it, but where is it written that bad perspective is not a legit reason? As long as the flag reason does not fall under this part: "The following are NOT valid reasons for flagging a post:
Duplicate: just parent to the original Banned artist: request that a member of site staff ban this post instead"
And "allowed content" as a flag reason like loli, guro, furry is also not valid/allowed.
Well, I don't specify at you personally, because I know you have a good eyes for that (to judge the do's and don'ts).
Then again, why bad perspective tag is exist? Might as well flag all of posts within that with same reason. If you found something with bad perspective, just add the tag then.
It seems someone specifically targeting my posts since yesterday. Six of that going into queue(3 posts with logical reason, the rest is one-liner).
Yes. Members are restricted to flag only 1 post per day. Gold(?), Platinum and Builders can flag 10 posts per day. Janitors, Mods(?) and Admins have no restrictions, as far as I know.
And I wouldn't insult a person who you don't know. Helps no one in the end :P.
@Sacriven Oh, if you'd know who flagged these posts yesterday...well, I think I don't user one liners anymore when they're so vague. They are helping no one in the end^^'.
Then again, why bad perspective tag is exist? Might as well flag all of posts within that with same reason. If you found something with bad perspective, just add the tag then.
Somehow looking at the Flag page, feels like someone with a very high standard found out his power to flag. Most flag reasons are reasonable, but its not enough for the post to get deleted IMO
Somehow looking at the Flag page, feels like someone with a very high standard found out his power to flag. Most flag reasons are reasonable, but its not enough for the post to get deleted IMO
Well, flags are just a request tool. It's like asking: Is this post really good enough? And then they should be treated as normal pending uploads and the Contributor status (mostly, flags are used for those uploads) should get ignored. That means: Would you approve this post if it were posted by a user without this permission.
Well, flags are just a request tool. It's like asking: Is this post really good enough? And then they should be treated as normal pending uploads and the Contributor status (mostly, flags are used for those uploads) should get ignored. That means: Would you approve this post if it were posted by a user without this permission.
I hope whoever he is, he's willing to visit the anatomy check pool and read what CodeKyuubi has stated.
On the other note, it seems flag's border color held a little part on all of this. Red color makes you felt threatened and uneasy. For red often associated with violence.
Well, flags are just a request tool. It's like asking: Is this post really good enough? And then they should be treated as normal pending uploads and the Contributor status (mostly, flags are used for those uploads) should get ignored. That means: Would you approve this post if it were posted by a user without this permission.
Ya, which is why I usually don't join in the Defensive Squad of Flagged Posts, since I know if the post is really up to the general standard, it will get approved anyway. Just find it amusing when I imagined some guy going on a flagging spree over something minor
Well, for the Minazuki drawing, it was flagged before but got solved afterwards. It means the moderators have approved it, right? Then why flagged it again?
Well, for the Minazuki drawing, it was flagged before but got solved afterwards. It means the moderators have approved it, right? Then why flagged it again?
Because multiple persons can flag a post. If someone fails, another one can step in and hope that the approvers don't approve. With that, one can theoretically start a flag hunt with multiple users...
I hope whoever he is, he's willing to visit the anatomy check pool and read what CodeKyuubi has stated.
On the other note, it seems flag's border color held a little part on all of this. Red color makes you felt threatened and uneasy. For red often associated with violence.
....I'm going too deep.
Well, there has to be a reason why there are many angry posts and red is proven to make people more angry^^. Maybe changing the color to yellow or whatever will help.
Some posts are worth flagging. This is not one of them. Not for deletion, and I don't think this is even worth flagging for reasons of a "Quality Check".
On the other note, it seems flag's border color held a little part on all of this. Red color makes you felt threatened and uneasy. For red often associated with violence.
Provence said:
Well, there has to be a reason why there are many angry posts and red is proven to make people more angry^^. Maybe changing the color to yellow or whatever will help.
Gotta go with Sacriven for that. Red colors for me, it's like you did a bad thing/blame you for something bad (not necessarily violence or anger) and you need to defend yourself. If it's flagged for just rechecking, I agree that we need another color so it's less provocating.
Please read the "Anatomy and Perspective" chapter in howto:upload.
Sacriven said:
Whoever you are, if you somehow grew bitter of me because of "THAT" thread, then you're acting childish within disguise of formal action.
I flagged this post. Please don't think this is something personal. 3 out out of 21 posts I flagged in the last two days belong to you: post #2472946, post #2469565, post #2469563
Here is a list of all 21 posts for full transparency:
I'll also sign future flags with my user name for better transparency. I don't really like this whole: "Please help me! I am targeted by some anonymous distasteful bully."
Provence said:
Well, flags are just a request tool. It's like asking: Is this post really good enough? And then they should be treated as normal pending uploads and the Contributor status (mostly, flags are used for those uploads) should get ignored. That means: Would you approve this post if it were posted by a user without this permission.
This!
Provence said:
Yes. Members are restricted to flag only 1 post per day. Gold(?), Platinum and Builders can flag 10 posts per day. Janitors, Mods(?) and Admins have no restrictions, as far as I know.
Member: Flag at most one post per day, if their account is at least one week old. Gold+: Flag up to 10 posts per day. Post Approver: Flag an unlimited number of posts per day.
Well, for the Minazuki drawing, it was flagged before but got solved afterwards. It means the moderators have approved it, right? Then why flagged it again?
The missing leg is not the problem. I flagged it again for a completely different reason. The flag is highly deserved IMO. It's a complete mess (100% view).
laisy said:
Somehow looking at the Flag page, feels like someone with a very high standard found out his power to flag.
Most flag reasons are reasonable, but its not enough for the post to get deleted IMO
Please remember that all posts in the mod queue are set for deletion by default. #equaltreatment
Apollyon said:
Some posts are worth flagging. This is not one of them. Not for deletion, and I don't think this is even worth flagging for reasons of a "Quality Check".
Do you agree that post #2473750 was worth flagging? You somehow instantly reapproved it. The arm looks horrible (broken / jelly) and it is not some insignificant element of the image. Please explain. Untransparent actions like these can trigger rants like those in topic #13113.
I respect your honesty, but your criteria of flagging (judging from this post) is a bit too high. Please reconsider and try to read CodeKyuubi's post on topic #13151
I respect your honesty, but your criteria of flagging (judging from this post) is a bit too high. Please reconsider and try to read CodeKyuubi's post on topic #13151
Yes, that's more like it. If bad proportion/perspective/etc. on some pic is to the point of making you cringe just by looking it, it deserves a flag. Otherwise, please use related tags like bad perspective or bad proportions.
Also, you shouldn't take anything from howto:upload in face level. That hasn't been updated for months, even years. Experience is the best teacher.
Do you agree that post #2473750 was worth flagging? You somehow instantly reapproved it. The arm looks horrible (broken / jelly) and it is not some insignificant element of the image. Please explain.
No, I don't agree it was worth flagging. "Horrible" isn't a word I would use for that. No part of that makes the entire image worth deleting.
Untransparent actions like these can trigger rants like those in topic #13113.
I don't need you to tell me that. And this is "untransparent action" is a picture being approved, not something that could have a large-scale effect on the site. There's a difference.
