Surely post #3208606?
Posted under General
Surely post #3208606?
I'm kinda feel conflicted about that one.
Mysterio006 said:
No.
Neon_Waves said:
Surely post #3208606?
Yes.
Unbreakable said:
EDIT: post #3212167
Gonna go with no to both.
arisboch said:
I'm kinda feel conflicted about that one.
No.
Unbreakable said:
Gonna say yes to this.
c933103 said:
No.
Unbreakable said:
I'd say yes
post #3243552
Artist tagged it shota, but imo it looks like any male you'd find anywhere, and no real visual size difference either.
CodeKyuubi said:
post #3243552
Artist tagged it shota, but imo it looks like any male you'd find anywhere, and no real visual size difference either.
I agree, there's no indication that it's a kid.
Neon_Waves said:
Surely post #3208606?
tapnek said:
Yes.
No idea why you'd consider this loli, all the characters have clearly defined curves. The bottom one has obvious breasts and even Alice has breast outlines. It's not even in a cutsie style, at best a petite tag.
Is post #2408574 shota?
iridescent_slime said:
Is post #2408574 shota?
I'd say yes.
I don't think these 2 should be tagged as loli. They don't even look like a loli not to mention the character themselves aren't even suppose to be loli.