Tag implications

BUR #8254 has been rejected.

create implication animal_hug -> hug
create implication doll_hug -> doll

These seem logical to me.
I'm not asking for "doll_hug > hug" because this is not always considered "hugging" (but could still be implemented), for animals though, it is almost always called hugging.

The wiki of doll hug suggests it should be used for clutching stuffed animals, and stuffed animal does not implicate doll (and nor should it).

skylightcrystal said:

The wiki of doll hug suggests it should be used for clutching stuffed animals, and stuffed animal does not implicate doll (and nor should it).

That's weird, I never knew about that clause and has always used object hug instead since it's not obvious at all from the name that it can (should?) be used for both.

Yeah, plush hug is aliased to doll hug so I'm not too sure about this.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #8254 (forum #202325) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.