cat's_cradle vs. string_figure

BUR #12098 has been rejected.

create implication cat's_cradle -> string_figures

Cat's cradle is a particular string figure game.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%27s_cradle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_figure

The bulk update request #12098 (forum #220564) has been rejected by @The_Bob.

BUR #12100 has been rejected.

create alias cat's_cradle -> string_figure

I tried to imply one to the other, but apparently cat's cradle makes up too much of the string figure tag for that. Thinking about it, it's probably better to just alias them into one string figure tag. Most people use the terms interchangeably anyway.

The_Bob said:

BUR #12100 has been rejected.

create alias cat's_cradle -> string_figure

I don't know about others, but cat's cradle is much more recognizable to me than string figure, so I'd be more inclined for the reverse of your alias.

BUR #12310 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create alias string_figure -> cat's_cradle

Reversed alias, as above. Technically cat's cradle is only one kind of string figure, but most people do use them interchangeably.

Cat's cradle is filled with suggestive pantyshots, might want to separate them out before they pollute string figure.

magcolo said:

Cat's cradle is filled with suggestive pantyshots, might want to separate them out before they pollute string figure.

I was going to go through the tag but it looks like someone did that, thank you!

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #12100 (forum #220568) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #12310 (forum #221312) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

BUR #13044 has been rejected.

create implication string_figure -> cat's_cradle

Would an implication be better? There's no reason these two tags should be completely unrelated (though I still think they should be merged).

The bulk update request #13044 (forum #225236) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #12310 (forum #221312) has been approved by @nonamethanks.