Posted under Tags
BUR #43613 is pending approval.
create implication tiger_print -> tiger_stripes
tiger print by definition has tiger stripes, but tiger stripes covers non-animal print examples of tiger-style stripes, such as the natural coloration of head hair and the body fur of furries, thus going for implication instead of aliasing.
This begs the question of whether we really want tiger-striped hair, tiger-striped neckties and tiger-striped cats to be under the same umbrella tag.
Maybe move tiger print to tiger print clothes? That would leave tiger stripes as a pretty ambiguous tag though.
Previous topic #20257
nonamethanks said:
Maybe move tiger print to tiger print clothes? That would leave tiger stripes as a pretty ambiguous tag though.
I think this would cut down on the ambiguity, but should things like handbags really be excluded from the tag/need their own tag?
Yeah, there's a reason why leopard print and cow print exist as tags; it's more than just clothes that qualify for animal print patterns like these.
