Light blush implies blush

BUR #44449 is pending approval.

create implication light_blush -> blush

A light blush is still a blush.

previously: topic #19396

Oops, I meant to vote neutral, sorry about that. I agree with Provence in the last thread about it leading to random usage. Seems difficult to define in a way that won't result in subjective tagging. If anything, light blush could probably be nuked.

Tieria said:

Oops, I meant to vote neutral, sorry about that. I agree with Provence in the last thread about it leading to random usage. Seems difficult to define in a way that won't result in subjective tagging. If anything, light blush could probably be nuked.

fyi: you can click the icon on your vote to undo it

The fuck, you can just undo your vote via the icon? I've been going all the way to my profile, clicking my voted forum posts and unvoting from there...