jxh2154 said:
This bit would need to be confirmed first. "Ruffles becomes gathers" sounds like "alias ruffles -> gathers", which would have an impact on the second clause there.
Well it's a bit hidden now but:
Cyberia-Mix said:
jxh, just in case, please remember to move ruffles to gathers before aliasing ruffles to frills.
I still have no preference about the direction of the alias. At least, keeping frills as the final name avoids renaming frilled_X tags into ruffled_X.
SystemXS said:
I have my doubts about this due to distinctions mentioned in earlier posts, -1.
Once again, if you don't want the implication then how do you suggest we tag gathered dresses for example? gathered_dress + dress + gathers ? Simply dress + gathers?
I assume the frilled_X tags exist because frills alone is not accurate enough when multiple pieces of clothing on the image can be relevant. If you think so, then it's logical that you also introduce gathered_X tags for gathers. But then you end up with, say, frilled_dress and gathered_dress returning completely separate results when the visuals are often very ambiguous. I personally don't mind that since I can make the distinction in the first place, but it's counter-intuitive for most users.
For this reason, I believe it's better not to create these gathered_X tags, and have a gathered dress tagged dress + gathers + frilled_dress + frills + trim, even though it's partly wrong.
SystemXS said:
embroidery implies trim
How about things like post #896588? Part of it is trim decoration (I wouldn't actually call that trim, but I can comply for practical uses), but the flower petals aren't.