Nuking more pokémon

BUR #7304 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

nuke legendary_pokemon
nuke mythical_pokemon

For all the same reasons we nuked the generation tags, these two tags mirror every argument.
topic #19097

As I stated in that topic and in forum #197168 earlier, these tags would make sense if they were for pictures that focus on legendary/mythical pokemon. As it stands however appear in any kind of picture with them, like post #443403, so they're really useless tags.

I kinda liked those tags. Anyway, if people don't want them, it's okay to delete them.

Danbooru used to have only legendary_pokemon for all Mythical / Legendary Pokémon before. For instance, post #496929 (Mew) used to be tagged legendary_pokemon, which was wrong... Mew is not really a Legendary Pokémon according to the Japanese dialogue from the games / anime / manga since gen 1. The English localization used to conflate them together with the word "Legendary" before, but then it stopped doing that at some point.

When I found out that legendary_pokemon tag at some point, I just populated mythical_pokemon which made it more accurate to the Pokémon media.

nonamethanks said:

As I stated in that topic and in forum #197168 earlier, these tags would make sense if they were for pictures that focus on legendary/mythical pokemon. As it stands however appear in any kind of picture with them, like post #443403, so they're really useless tags.

I disagree with that. Maybe if it were called legendary_pokemon_focus (which we don't need to create, this is just an example), it could be for a focus on those kinds of Pokémon.

The bulk update request #7304 (forum #197171) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

Danielx21 said:

When I found out that legendary_pokemon tag at some point, I just populated mythical_pokemon which made it more accurate to the Pokémon media.

Frankly put, nobody cares that Mew is a mythical pokemon and not a legendary pokemon. This kind of distinction makes sense for bulbapedia, not for us.