Posted under General
Individual said:
Where did you get them from? Most likely because they have no source.
Ex-hentai. I uploaded two different images from that before the pool, they are post #6240167 and post #6240166 and they weren't approved either though they were translated.
post #6234591
post #6234604
post #6234610
I don't understand, is there a mistake in the body in these pictures
Lord_Seeker said:
I was wondering why none of these images from this pool were approved. As far as I can tell, the images were good, or at least, as good as it can get. Is there a reason why?
The pool in question: pool #20063
Lord_Seeker said:
Ex-hentai. I uploaded two different images from that before the pool, they are post #6240167 and post #6240166 and they weren't approved either though they were translated.
They're all samples. I wanted to approve them and then request replacements but realized I don't have the energy for it. If you can do the latter yourself then I'll approve them.
yuki-osu said:
Nice to meet you, I made my first illustration submission on this danbooru and it was deleted.
What could have caused this, if you don't mind me asking.
This artist seems to have some good potential but for now the pics just look too amateurish to get approved
also, unrelated to the matter of approval but you really should put some effort into tagging your posts.
You're still new so taking some time to just go look at what gets approved will be a first step towards getting a feel of the standards, and checking the tags, their wikis, and howto:tag / howto:tag checklist , you'll eventually get used to tags to the point of managing a lot more tags on your posts in just 2 minutes
post #6242076 looks fine, and the reference was used well by the artist, but hope someone can give me useful feedback if there is some anomaly found on the post.
need some feedback for this post, because It looks just fine
post #6242237
pablo.gonzales.2007 said:
post #6242076 looks fine, and the reference was used well by the artist, but hope someone can give me useful feedback if there is some anomaly found on the post.
also this post #6242451
Hello, I would like to have more accurate commentary on why this post was deleted, so I could know how to avoid these problems if there are any.
Still waiting for feedback regarding these two sets (both NSFW):
Set #1
post #6181989
post #6181990
Set #2
post #6181996
post #6181997
post #6182002
Can someone explain why these have been rejected?
EverMind said:
Hello, I would like to have more accurate commentary on why this post was deleted, so I could know how to avoid these problems if there are any.
it's the anatomy, i would say
I think these posts have enough quality to be approved. The author of these posts already has a lot of posts approved here.
post #6245666
What's the matter, isn't she running in the right posture?
what's wrong with post #6243482?
Damn
What's wrong with them?
Your standards of preference are such a headache
QQWWU said:
Damn
What's wrong with them?
Your standards of preference are such a headache
I wasn't active during the approval process for either of these but there's one thing I can say about both of them. Hands.
MarqFJA87 said:
Still waiting for feedback regarding these two sets (both NSFW):
Set #1
post #6181989
post #6181990Set #2
post #6181996
post #6181997
post #6182002Can someone explain why these have been rejected?
Hello???
Need some opinions about this one, because some approvers said it has "bad neck" and "weird face angle".
post #6242193
I think it looks fine to me, and she only makes some evil face to me.
