santander said:
Those don't really look loli to me (especially the first one).
Posted under General
santander said:
Those don't really look loli to me (especially the first one).
post #5831462 has a parent and siblings that have been incorrectly marked as loli or shota at some point in the past few months. I can't think of any other reason I would need a gold account (which I don't have and so I can't verify myself if that's what happened) to view them. I know they used to not be marked that because I used to be able to view them and they didn't look like shota to me.
Updated
post #7394889, post #7394966, post #7395022, and their children
Hankpropaniac57 said:
post #7394889, post #7394966, post #7395022, and their children
I'd say yes to the 2nd and 3rd one, unsure about the first one.
I can't tell if this is loli.
tapnek said:
I can't tell if this is loli.
Definitely not. The upper body is far too developed.
I'm going to need a second opinion for post #7409165 and post #7382445. Also check the ratings please.
Also someone please check post #6038966 and post #6032517, these are the same image and should either both be tagged as loli or neither tagged as loli.
post #7407514
This probably qualifies for shota. Just want to make sure.
Edit: Also post #4059603 and children.
Edit 2: post #7404553 and children.
Despite the comments on the parent post, I don't think the characters actually look young enough to qualify for loli.
Updated
post #7425725
She is shown to have boobs, and I'm not sure whether her body type can be really called child-like.
arisboch said:
post #7425725
She is shown to have boobs, and I'm not sure whether her body type can be really called child-like.
Seconded.
Blank_User said:
post #7407514
This probably qualifies for shota. Just want to make sure.
I would totally rate that G though
post #35680 girl on right
c_spl said:
post #35680 girl on right
Both characters look about the same age to me.