Danbooru

How do I tag this?

Posted under Tags

Unbreakable said:

post #6226206 got tagged with guro, does the tag really fit?

No. The image is necrophilic (barely), but nothing about it is grotesque enough to warrant being tagged with guro. There are no exposed organs and there's no special focus on mutilation or disfigurement or excessive violence or anything that would warrant this being tagged with guro. There are other necrophilia posts which aren't tagged guro because nothing excessive has happened to the corpse: it's just a girl's body with blood. She even looks like she's alive in this one.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Unbreakable said:

post #6226206 got tagged with guro, does the tag really fit?

I think there's an argument to be made that basically all necrophilia would fall under guro, under the pretense that it's pretty safe to consider it all highly disturbing.

In this case specifically, the "uh wtf"-factor also extends beyond merely the gore, so in the absence of a possible umbrella tag (disturbing maybe?), I'd advocate for tagging it with guro + ero guro.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Anyone who thinks murder and necrophilia shouldn't be tagged guro is a psychopath and should have their tagging privileges revoked. It's overly literal tagging like thinking implied or imminent bestiality shouldn't be tagged bestiality because "technically you can't see it" or "it hasn't happened yet". The point of tags is for searching (and as a consequence, blacklisting). People who blacklist guro probably also don't want to see "technically not guro because you can't see organs" or whatever braindead argument you can make in defence of it. Use your brains instead of taking every wiki so seriously that it overrides any sensibilities. Shit like that gets tagged R-18G on pixiv for a reason, don't be stupid.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Talulah said:

Anyone who thinks murder and necrophilia shouldn't be tagged guro is a psychopath and should have their tagging privileges revoked. It's overly literal tagging like thinking implied or imminent bestiality shouldn't be tagged bestiality because "technically you can't see it" or "it hasn't happened yet". The point of tags is for searching (and as a consequence, blacklisting). People who blacklist guro probably also don't want to see "technically not guro because you can't see organs" or whatever braindead argument you can make in defence of it. Use your brains instead of taking every wiki so seriously that it overrides any sensibilities. Shit like that gets tagged R-18G on pixiv for a reason, don't be stupid.

This is a really aggressive response. Guro has a specific meaning - it's not just anything to do with violence or death. There's nothing stopping anyone from blacklisting murder or necrophilia along with it.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Mayhem-Chan said:

post #5576350 , post #6438091
Is there any tag for this artstyle trope of "stumpy legs" where there's no tapering of the legs at the bottom and the feet are basically just like if they were hooves but without being hooves?
I really feel like this should get a tag if there isn't any, but no idea how to chose a name or how to search for it.

It's a part of chibi-artstyle guidelines to draw legs like this. Not sure you can call you examples chibi, though. There is also no_feet which is probably you're looking for.

Updated by DanbooruBot

nkuylo said:

It's a part of chibi-artstyle guidelines to draw legs like this. Not sure you can call you examples chibi, though. There is also no_feet which is probably you're looking for.

yea i know about chibi style using this, but i'm really talking specifically about non-chibi cases.
Seems like no feet is indeed the relevant tag for this, thanks

Updated by DanbooruBot