What's so wrong with these two?
Compared to their current active parent, one is animated, and the other has higher resolution and is uncropped.
Is there something really abhorrent on them that should be avoided at all costs?
Posted under General
What's so wrong with these two?
Compared to their current active parent, one is animated, and the other has higher resolution and is uncropped.
Is there something really abhorrent on them that should be avoided at all costs?
hdk5 said:
What's so wrong with these two?
Compared to their current active parent, one is animated, and the other has higher resolution and is uncropped.
Is there something really abhorrent on them that should be avoided at all costs?
Both have the rather obtrusive calendar thing in there while the parent is much cleaner.
I'm not exactly certain why post #6186754 wasn't approved, I believe I followed the guidelines right but correct me if I'm wrong.
And also I don't know why post #6190852 hasn't been approved when the parent image was.
SolRush said:
post #6184534
post #6181005
post #6180940The last two are from artists' posts consistently uploaded here.
consistently uploaded by a user with unres. most, if not all images by that artist probably wouldn't make it through the mod queue due to their low quality.
psychedelic_rabbit said:
I have nothing to say about the image itself, but be mindful that uploading a niche topic like furry limits the number of interested approvers even before image details are considered.
bob14234657 said:
consistently uploaded by a user with unres. most, if not all images by that artist probably wouldn't make it through the mod queue due to their low quality.
Though I don't see anything wrong with them initially. The artwork looks decent to me with basic shading, outlining, and their own effects. Especially post #6184534, with a touch of lens flares with the brightness and the emotion it contains based on current events.
why the there two post the not approved? I think that very good
post #6144212
post #6134225
QQWWU said:
post #6188385
post #6188393
post #6188305
Why are these 3 posts not allowed to pass, is there a mistake in the body composition?
post #6163869
post #6175321
post #6180337
post #6180181 (no source)
post #6171542
post #6139219
Please help, Whats wrong please reply me. It's look good.
post #5941774
post #5941778
post #5941779
post #5941780
It's look good why delete ?
Too Western? Plenty of other artworks by this artist featuring characters from Avatar have been approved in the past, so I don't see why this one wasn't approved.
Still waiting for feedback on this.
MarqFJA87 said:
Alright, is there anything actually wrong with these posts that justifies their deletion?
Edit: They're not noticeably worse than the posts from the same artist that have been approved (and most of those are recent, so no "old standards were lax" excuse here).
[all NSFW to one degree or the other]
post #6181975
post #6181976
post #6181978
post #6181979
post #6181980
post #6181981
post #6181989
post #6181990
post #6181996
post #6181997
post #6182002
post #6182016
post #6182017
post #6182024
post #6182025
post #6182037
post #6182041
post #6182049
Also, add these three posts to the list.
post #6186512 (Yes, the message says "legs", but I fail to see why the average viewer would bother laser-focusing on a peripheral part of the image instead of the obvious center of attention.)
post #6187409
post #6187486
MarqFJA87 said:
Still waiting for feedback on this.
Also, add these three posts to the list.
post #6186512 (Yes, the message says "legs", but I fail to see why the average viewer would bother laser-focusing on a peripheral part of the image instead of the obvious center of attention.)
post #6187409
post #6187486
Nobody will ever answer to all of your images above. It's just too much. You should focus on fewer images, if you really want any feedback on here.
Also, the legs are horrible. It doesn't matter if they're not the focus, they're pretty much an eyecatcher.
post #6188340
Any feedbacks?
Nacha said:
Nobody will ever answer to all of your images above. It's just too much. You should focus on fewer images, if you really want any feedback on here.
Very well, let's start with the ones that most definitely don't make any sense to me.
I cannot even remotely see any sort of problem with either image that explains why they were rejected.
MarqFJA87 said:
Very well, let's start with the ones that most definitely don't make any sense to me.
I cannot even remotely see any sort of problem with either image that explains why they were rejected.
First one has arms that bend weird, the head and neck look off too.
Second one has a fucked leg and the wine glass and arm holding it look wonky.
whats the difference between these other than the popularity of the series
accepted
post #6190284
post #6190292
deleted or will be deleted
post #6190469
post #6199359
zetsubousensei said:
First one has arms that bend weird, the head and neck look off too.
The arms aren't bent weirdly, that's just an artifact of her baggy sleeves obfuscating their positioning. I even tested it myself, and concluded that she'd only need to be a bit more flexible in the wrist to perfectly position her hands the way they're in the image.
And I have no idea what you're talking about, the head and neck are fine. You will have to elaborate on what you're supposedly seeing.
Second one has a fucked leg and the wine glass and arm holding it look wonky.
What do you mean? They all look fine to me.
zetsubousensei said:
First one has arms that bend weird, the head and neck look off too.
Second one has a fucked leg and the wine glass and arm holding it look wonky.
for the second one, to me it's actually the arms that look the most okay, while the legs, butt, breasts and even back itself look more off